The human being is neither purely mechanical nor entirely ethereal. We exist as psycho-physical entities where mental processes affect the body in measurable ways and physiological states significantly influence our cognition, emotions and perception. This interconnected feedback loop becomes especially significant when discussing trauma and growth. Trauma is not just something that happens to the mind; it is a full-system event that shapes cellular function, distorts biological rhythm and locks memory into tissues. When we apply emerging perspectives from meta-biology and spin mechanics, a deeper understanding begins to emerge; one that reframes healing as a return to internal coherence rather than mere symptom management.
Meta-biology, by definition, looks beyond the biochemical processes typically studied in mainstream biology. It includes how consciousness, energetic environments and psychological states interact with physical biology. Modern research in epigenetics shows that gene expression can change in response to chronic stress, emotional neglect and environmental stimuli (Zhang & Meaney, 2010). These changes are not purely mental nor purely physical; they reflect a third space where thought patterns and trauma responses alter biological function. Consequently, a person living in fear or dissociation is not only dealing with abstract emotional issues but may also be experiencing measurable disruptions in cellular behaviour.
Spin mechanics, on the other hand, introduces a quantum-level layer of influence. In physics, ‘spin’ refers to a quantum property of particles that determines how they interact, transmit energy and create magnetic fields (Arndt et al., 2009). While not directly observable in the way classical movement is, spin significantly impacts molecular alignment, bond formation and energetic coherence. Applied to human biology, this concept implies that trauma may result in a sort of energetic decoherence where the body’s natural rhythm is disrupted, leading to physiological chaos that cannot be resolved through thought alone.
Trauma often fragments this mind–body unity. As Bessel van der Kolk (2015) argues, the body continues to ‘keep the score’ long after an event has passed. Symptoms like digestive issues, inflammation, migraines and autoimmune dysregulation are not random—they are physical expressions of unresolved psychic shock. Likewise, studies in neurovisceral integration reveal that people with trauma histories often exhibit reduced vagal tone and lowered heart rate variability, both of which impair the body’s ability to self-regulate (Thayer & Lane, 2000). This research demonstrates that trauma is not just about memory; it is about broken physiological rhythm and feedback loops that need to be restored from within the system itself.
These disruptions may be tied to spin. In healthy biological systems, spin-based coherence ensures communication between cells, synchronisation of rhythms and stability of energy flow. However, trauma appears to destabilise this coherence, creating ‘hotspots’ of dysregulation like stored tension in the muscles, disorganised brainwave activity or chronic adrenal activation. Psychoneuroimmunology confirms that long-term emotional stress impairs immune function and increases systemic inflammation, creating chronic health risks (Irwin & Cole, 2011). Furthermore, these biochemical symptoms often reinforce psychological ones, continuing the loop of fragmentation.
Trauma recovery must therefore include both mind and body. Cognitive insight alone does not reset cellular rhythm. While therapy and self-reflection are valuable, they must be supported by interventions that restore coherence at the energetic and physiological level. This is where practices such as somatic experiencing, breathwork, EMDR and movement-based therapies become essential. Not only do these methods support the nervous system but they also reintroduce a consistent rhythm that helps the body feel safe again.
For example, breathwork has been shown to increase parasympathetic activity, reduce cortisol levels and improve vagal regulation (Saoji et al., 2019). From the spin perspective, rhythmic breathing may also act as a tuning mechanism which realigns the oscillatory patterns of the body and restoring inner harmony. Similarly, posture and movement significantly impact mood and thought. Studies show that sitting upright improves emotional clarity and reduces rumination which highlights how the body can influence the mind just as much as the reverse (Peper & Lin, 2012).
It is also worth noting that recovery through sound or frequency-based methods such as binaural beats, harmonic toning or even chanting have shown promising results in trauma recovery. Sound frequencies appear to synchronise brainwave activity, re-pattern thought, and regulate mood by interacting directly with the body’s energetic and neural fields (Rubik et al., 2015). Additionally, long-term mindfulness practice has been found to increase grey matter density in areas responsible for emotional regulation and body awareness (Hölzel et al., 2011), further supporting the idea that rhythm and coherence are central to repair.
Taken together, these insights point to a holistic model where trauma recovery means re-spinning the entire being, not just managing symptoms. This involves working with frequency, rhythm, sensation, posture, intention and emotion as one unified process. Rather than treating mind and body as two separate systems, meta-biology and spin mechanics allow us to view the human as a multidimensional field; one that holds memory, vibration and self-regulating potential at every level.
In summary, the psycho-physical human cannot be healed by focusing on thoughts alone nor by targeting isolated physiological symptoms. True coherence comes when the body’s internal spin, rhythm and biofield are restored to alignment with conscious awareness. Trauma knocks us out of sync, yet the body remembers the rhythm it once held. Through intentional practice, breath, sound and movement, we do not merely recover, we remember how to spin in our own natural frequency again.
References:
Arndt, M., Juffmann, T., & Vedral, V. (2009). Quantum physics meets biology. HFSP Journal, 3(6), 386–400. https://doi.org/10.2976/1.3244985
Damasio, A. R. (1994). Descartes’ error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain. Avon Books.
Hölzel, B. K., Carmody, J., Vangel, M., Congleton, C., Yerramsetti, S. M., Gard, T., & Lazar, S. W. (2011). Mindfulness practice leads to increases in regional brain grey matter density. Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging, 191(1), 36–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pscychresns.2010.08.006
Irwin, M. R., & Cole, S. W. (2011). Reciprocal regulation of the neural and innate immune systems. Nature Reviews Immunology, 11(9), 625–632. https://doi.org/10.1038/nri3042
Peper, E., & Lin, I. M. (2012). Increase or decrease depression: How body postures influence your energy level. Biofeedback, 40(3), 125–130. https://doi.org/10.5298/1081-5937-40.3.01
Rubik, B., Muehsam, D., Hammerschlag, R., & Jain, S. (2015). Biofield science and healing: History, terminology, and concepts. Global Advances in Health and Medicine, 4(Suppl), 8–14. https://doi.org/10.7453/gahmj.2015.038.suppl
Saoji, A. A., Raghavendra, B. R., & Manjunath, N. K. (2019). Effects of yogic breath regulation: A narrative review of scientific evidence. Journal of Ayurveda and Integrative Medicine, 10(1), 50–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaim.2017.07.008
Thayer, J. F., & Lane, R. D. (2000). A model of neurovisceral integration in emotion regulation and dysregulation. Journal of Affective Disorders, 61(3), 201–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0327(00)00338-4
van der Kolk, B. A. (2015). The body keeps the score: Brain, mind, and body in the healing of trauma. Penguin Books.
Zhang, T.-Y., & Meaney, M. J. (2010). Epigenetics and the environmental regulation of the genome and its function. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 439–466. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163625
Mystic Anomanly 